Skip to main content

Apple 2012: Resolutionary, Not Revolutionary



Tim Cook, CEO of Apple probably said it best at last weeks' "new iPad" presentation when he said we are now totally immersed into a post-PC world, where Apple is at the forefront, and Apple has reinvented portable computing with it's iPad. But Apple also made a very interesting pun that not only applies to it's new iPad, but also to the company itself in this last year. It's not revolutionary... but rather, resolutionary. There have been countless huge changes to the company in this last year, but all the while, the company has been able to shift itself slowly in the right direction, making small changes to big things, and doing a great job at it.



Steve Jobs has been dead for several months now. Although Apple hasn't fully recovered from the real awe that the man left behind in his death, they have certainly paid their dues to him with the lack of direction changes within the company. Although we'd all like to say "Steve would have wanted it that way" or "this is the way things would have been anyhow," we all know Apple needs a change. Apple always needed change. That's exactly what Steve brought to the table. Change. A new perspective on the industry. Or even a new industry. That's what set Apple apart from the competition. And honestly, change can either be great or horrible. Apple is just really good at the great part. Although Apple arguably "lost" a visionary, they didn't lose their spirit. And this years' new products and enthusiasm are proof of that.

The year 2012 (for Apple) started with the continued hype and complete adoration of Apple's iPhone 4S- the current leading iOS product offered by the company. This product is a perfect example of the phrase "resolutionary", as it received very minor internal updates over major external updates. And believe me when I say this, I'm not the biggest fan of a phone made with two fragile panes of glass and a brushed stainless steel rim. Then again, it's undeniable that the design is beautiful, and, if I weren't so clumsy, I would totally opt for such a product as my main phone. But alas, I digress.

At the same event Apple "updated" their iPod line, adding new software capabilities to the nano, and adding to the mix a white iPod touch. And why shouldn't they? There's nothing wrong with any of the iPods, even the seemingly-forgotten iPod classic.

Apple continued on strong with a great software lineup, a preview of the next great edition of OS X- Mountain Lion- which, as the name suggests, is an improvement upon the previous operating system, OS X Lion. But honestly, this has really been "the year" for software. Especially for users who purchased Apple products for the iLife or iWork suite. Then again, software is the driving force behind the purchase of all Apple products, despite the excellent hardware that accompanies it.

With all of these minor incremental changes being made on big name products, a follower of Apple or the tech industry might have made the assumption that something big was in store for the next generation of iPad. People were looking forward to a revolutionary new design, the specs of a decent laptop computer, an amazing screen resolution, a new camera, and a load of new apps to improve upon the iOS application experience. Although users didn't get the first part, everything else was included with the "new iPad" that are proof that a big design change isn't needed to make a great product. I mean come on people. The new iPad had a retina display with a higher pixel density and pixel dimensions than an HD television.

So yes, Apple has gone "resolutionary" instead of "revolutionary" this year. Nobody expected them to go that route. Some people think and expect Apple to go the extra mile with every new product because... well... they're Apple. It's just the way things are. But Apple is also brilliant in disguising a new product with a load of potential. And that is what every product this year has been. And for that, I give Apple a lot of credit. Losing the big man in charge doesn't usually end well. But Apple has really made the best of it. Oh, and according to the rumor mill, Steve Jobs isn't the only person who designed these products, despite what everyone else thinks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2016 or 2020? The Losing Strategy of Centrism

It feels like it’s 2016 all over again for the Democrats. Fighting through an overcrowded field of initially over 20 candidates, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden have emerged as the frontrunners for presidential nominee in the Democratic Party. Both candidates are wildly different from each other on nearly every issue from healthcare, to student debt, climate change, and everything in-between. Biden represents a resurgent albeit uninspiring consensus of a panicked  Democratic Establishment (comprised of the DNC and its wealthy donors, not African American voters as a confused Biden recently suggested) that has made this same bet on centrists before with Walter Mondale, Al Gore, John Kerry, and most recently, Hillary Clinton—and each time we lost big to Republicans. Conversely, Sanders represents a party running to the left, fed up with the imbalance of wealth and power in the American political system, Bernie embodies a progressive vision for an America that works for everyone, not corpor…

Tap Tap! The Apple Watch Review

7 A.M, I wake up to a gentle ringing and pick up my beautiful silver Apple Watch from the pseudo-charging cradle that lays beside my bed on a nightstand: it is time for another day with my latest toy and companion.

As I shower, watch on wrist, I shift through Bob Dylan and Joan Baez tracks while checking the weather and responding to late night texts I had missed. The watch, although quoted to be water resistant, is in actuality waterproof for short periods of time and ignorant to certain low water pressures.

On my drive to the office my watch vibrates with a reminder to call my friend David, who I easily ask Siri to call and I talk to from my watch. Is this real life? Sure is! The sound isn't tinny, it's not booming either, but just loud and clear enough to enjoy the conversation instead of dreading it.

Throughout the work day I receive dozens of light taps that don't annoy me the way my obnoxious Pebble did (vibrating so loud it would shake the table under my wrists). The…

Why Isn't Everyone Using Ubuntu? (Rant)

I've been an avid Linux user for many years now, starting with my adoption of Red Hat on my old beige box HP, going down to running Ubuntu 7.04 on my old Gateway 15 inch hunker of a laptop, and now on my 14 inch Dell Vostro 3450. I've at least tried every version of Canonical's famous community-supported OS since 2003. And I've also experienced such distros as Fedora, Mint and MEPIS. Needless to say, I've certainly gotten my feet wet in the Linux world, so using Ubuntu has never been anything new or odd to me.

There's just something so intimate about using Linux, from the installation, to boot, to use- everything feels more personal, more customized, more free. And isn't that the very purpose for the existence of Linux distributions?

This in itself is one of the main reasons I typically recommend Ubuntu over other linux distributions. It works with incredible consistency, is supported by an unbelievably large community of devout users, is super easy to use, a…