Skip to main content

Editorial: Can Apple Conquer TV?

Max Bleich is the Editor-in-Chief of thetechtile, who monthly publishes to the website a long-form editorial on the world in consumer electronics. From Apple to Google to Sony and Samsung, just about every topic in the tech world has or will be hit at some point. This month, Max will be commenting on the Apple TV, and it's underlying ambition to rule the living room. 

Perhaps one of the loftiest news stories that we've seen explode over the 'net in the last few days has been CBS's public revealing of their denial of an opportunity to work with Apple, who would have brought CBS content to Apple's TV platform. For anybody who isn't aware, the current Apple TV is a $99 device that currently serves as a do-everything streaming box. It connects iTunes content with YouTube, Netflix, user photo slideshows and news. However, despite the low price point, the device still remains nothing more than a "hobby"- which the late Steve Jobs has considered it to be from the beginning. However, the surfacing of the situation with CBS has brought to light Jobs's desire to dominate the TV market somehow, revealing that this was likely his last big project at Apple before his death.

For anybody who's used the Apple TV, they know that the interface is beyond easy to navigate though. From it's beautifully designed menus, to the simple dexterity of the remote- it seems so perfect. Nothing is there that doesn't need to be there. The widgets around the interface hide when they're not needed. And ultimately, that's what makes an interface great. But there's something about the device that just feels so... incomplete. Sure, we can stream our iTunes library, rent movies and television shows, stream our stuff over Netflix, watch the vast library of videos on YouTube, display a slideshow of our dearest pictorial memories or listen to the radio.

There's a lot to be offered for the meek price of $99. Yet, the aspect of the television we've come to know and love, one which has forever been dominated by cable providers, is still not on the device. Apple isn't yet a viable service provider. Then again, that simply isn't what the Apple TV is aimed to do. But Apple wants to wreak havoc in the industry. Why wouldn't they? They're Apple.

And here comes the missing piece to the puzzle- the true reason Apple TV and Google TV are still nothing more than hobbies for only the bravest techies to face. There's no instant monthly subscriber content! If people saw Apple as a service provider, I guarantee just about everybody and their brother would run out and buy one of their boxes and sign up for iCable. And that's what Apple looks to be willing to do.

If Apple were to take a dip into the TV service provider world, people would finally see the value in investing in the cheap, but difficult-to-sell Apple TV. Nobody wants to buy two boxes when they could have one that does it all. It's simple consumer logic. If anybody in the world can solve this problem however, it would most likely be Apple- and rightfully so. Hopefully within the next few weeks, Apple will roll out the final project of Steve Jobs, and hopefully- it will be as amazing as we all hope it will.


  1. [...] menus, to the simple dexterity of the remote- it seems so perfect. Nothing is there that …Via Be Sociable, Share! Related PostsNo Related PostNo tags for this [...]


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tap Tap! The Apple Watch Review

7 A.M, I wake up to a gentle ringing and pick up my beautiful silver Apple Watch from the pseudo-charging cradle that lays beside my bed on a nightstand: it is time for another day with my latest toy and companion. As I shower, watch on wrist, I shift through Bob Dylan and Joan Baez tracks while checking the weather and responding to late night texts I had missed. The watch, although quoted to be water resistant, is in actuality waterproof for short periods of time and ignorant to certain low water pressures. On my drive to the office my watch vibrates with a reminder to call my friend David, who I easily ask Siri to call and I talk to from my watch. Is this real life? Sure is! The sound isn't tinny, it's not booming either, but just loud and clear enough to enjoy the conversation instead of dreading it. Throughout the work day I receive dozens of light taps that don't annoy me the way my obnoxious Pebble did (vibrating so loud it would shake the table under

The Best Value Tablet: iPad Air 4th Generation Review (2020)

  “What’s a computer?” I’m a nerd. I collect and restore old iBooks and MacBooks for fun. I built a PC (who hasn’t in 2020?). I own a lot of computers. But there is no computer I love nearly as much as the iPad. And I have had a lot of iPads. I waited in line for the first iPad in 2010, thinking it would be an ideal MacBook replacement, and it fell noticeably short. Beyond not having a physical keyboard accessory that was easy to transport, the original iPad simply lacked the available software and processing power of the Mac and was ultimately not sufficient at the time as a full-on ‘computer.’ I didn’t give up. Becoming particularly enamored with the idea of turning an iPad into a laptop replacement, I tried again, souping up an iPad Mini 1 st generation with a keyboard case (a ClamCase—remember those?!). Again, the iPad was not enough. I tried again, this time with the iPad 5 th generation. I loved this iPad. I managed to get most of my work done during a summer internship wit

Editorial: Where HP Went Wrong, Right, and How to Fix Things

On April 28, 2010, HP announced it would acquire Palm for $1.2 Billion. At this time, HP was doing great, but Palm was failing fast- their products were aging, and the new hardware and software wasn't selling very well. At the same time though, the software had a lot of potential, being the only true user interface competitor to Apple's iPhone. As the year marched on, the Palm brand died and was replaced by HP. On July 1, 2011, HP launched the first and the last webOS tablet. Then on August 18- a mere fifty days after the release of the HP TouchPad, the large, successful company announced that they were done with webOS, they were done with the Pre and they were done with the TouchPad. The product itself didn't even have the time to grow or evolve. To add insult to injury, the company also revealed it's plan to duck out of the hardware business and jump into software. What they got right. The Touchpad, although rather bulky when compared to the competition, was the only